Showing posts with label Future of Hampton Roads. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Future of Hampton Roads. Show all posts

Friday, May 8, 2009

Calling all Hampton Roads Bloggers!

Are you a "citizen journalist"? Are you willing to link your blog with Hampton Roads SmartRegion.org and gain access to a national / global audience?

If you write at least one post per week, then send us your "blogger resume" ... which consists of a link to your blog and a 1-2 sentence byline.

Not a blogger now, but interested in sharing your local reaction to national news AND local reflections on categories of national interest? Perhaps we can help... read on:



Background: On April 4th, the first Hampton Roads Civic Engagement Summit held by the Hampton Roads Center for Civic Engagement (HRCCE), in cooperation with the Hampton Roads Partnership, WHRO, The Planning Council, and the Future of Hampton Roads, presented us with the beginning of a conversation about where we are, where we want to be, and what will be required to get “there” as a region.

The results of HRCCE’s Batten Survey were released at the Summit and reveal that in Hampton Roads we have:
  • Opportunities…civic capital in Hampton Roads is plentiful…our job is to cultivate it and capitalize on it, as a region;
  • Disconnectedness…citizens say they are somewhat or very interested in working with others to solve regional issues, yet they don’t feel invited; however, civic leaders say they want citizens to educate themselves, participate more in civic matters when invited, and let their views be known;
  • Paradoxes…we agree on major issues such as the economy and transportation and want to solve our regional problems, but as a result of this survey, citizens say we lack a mean by which to come together as a region to work on these problems, together. Furthermore, while citizens follow news about local government and public affair somewhat or very closely, a majority of respondents say there is no reliable source or don’t know if there is a reliable source of information.
Citizens in attendance working in small groups at the Summit had these solutions to recommend for better civic engagement:
  • Increase trust, honesty, transparency and the flow of information;
  • Provide more regional emphasis by governments and media;
  • Decide who/what organization is the regional voice;
  • Develop a region-wide blog involving issue experts and citizens;
  • Develop a regional website with links to each government agency and organization;
  • Use information technology to increase citizen’s access, to educate/improve conversation between citizens and elected officials to make representative democracy work better;
  • Provide an information portal, a common shared repository for data, information and opinion, accessible to the public in a variety of ways.

SmartRegion.org could be a means to that end, that ONE reliable source of information, a portal to connect all of Hampton Roads’ organizations, citizens and civic leaders alike, and to present Hampton Roads to a global audience as well.

Hampton Roads’ SmartRegion.org has been selected as the new “Military Bastion” for Patchwork Nation with the upcoming re-launch of the project on the PBS NewsHour’s website. The NewsHour, in partnership with WHRO, joins the Christian Science Monitor's Patchwork Nation project to provide coverage of local economic impacts as a way to build a local-national
collaboration model incorporating citizen journalists (bloggers).

With the pending re-launch as an expanded, multi-faceted, truly regionally-cooperative blog, SmartRegion.org will be the face of Hampton Roads to the nation and beyond.

Expanded Categories:
About Hampton Roads
Arts & Culture
Business Community
Economy
Education & Workforce
Government & Citizens
Hampton Roads History
Military Bastion
Research & Technology
Transportation & Planning

Organizations all over Hampton Roads are being asked to pool valuable resources and join this effort to provide blog articles (i.e. “posts”) and broad distribution of a regional electronic Newsletter, similar to (and replacing) the current HRP e-News.

The idea is NOT to create more work for each organization but to work smarter, not harder, to offer access to citizens and outlets for information like never before, to answer our citizens’ call for ONE regional focus, ONE regional resource.

Next steps? Contact HRP Communication Manager, Missy Schmidt, today at Missy@HRP.org or (757) 625-4696 for more information and/or to be a part of this unprecedented effort.

Sunday, April 12, 2009

Civic Engagement, the results are in

The Hampton Roads Center for Civic Engagement's Batten Surveys: A Regional Civic Capital Assessment 2008 - 2009

"Civic engagement is more than just attending a meeting or a public hearing. It's not a passive concept; it's an active concept. It's when people actively engage in their neighborhood or community either by doing something or really engaging in the thinking around doing something that allows them to create some positive change."
-Chris Gates, Executive Director,
Philanthropy for Active Civic Engagement

Complete Survey Results (56 pages)
Survey Summary (12 pages)
Slideshow showing the results of the Batten Surveys (21 pages)
Slideshow showing the opinions of Summit participants (26 pages)

Note: Figures in red are actual demographic statistics for Hampton Roads

Click on links above to view presentations in a new browser window; click on "Full" to view full screen; click on "Download" to download the presentation to your own computer.


The Hampton Roads Center for Civic Engagement (HRCCE) structures and facilitates civic engagement processes that provide for the productive collaboration between the citizens and their governments.

By encouraging the inclusion of more citizens in the public choices related to their region’s quality of life and future, the Center’s work enhances the accountability and transparency of public agencies.

The Center is a neutral source of information to support fact-based dialogue on the thorniest of regional issues. Our work helps boost regional understanding and brings into the public dialogue voices that have long been overlooked.

Saturday, April 4, 2009

Civic Engagement - An Executive Summary

The first Hampton Roads Civic Engagement Summit was held at the Virginia Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Center (VMASC) in Suffolk, Virginia on Saturday April 4th, 2009. Hosted by Hampton Roads Center for Civic Engagement (HRCCE) in association with the Future of Hampton Roads, Hampton Roads Partnership, The Planning Council, and WHRO Public Television.

During breakfast, “Be There, Be Counted” video vignettes were provided by WHRO’s Center for Regional Citizenship (CRC). A live internet connection was also provided to those who wished to view HamptonRoadsPerforms.org, the recently launched website that supplements current strategic planning and civic engagement efforts by focusing on regional performance. Designed to inform and engage citizens and community leaders in discussions about the future of Hampton Roads, information on the website answers the question, “How is Hampton Roads Doing?” on a broad array of indicators, ranging from personal income to educational attainment and traffic congestion.


Jim Oliver, Chairman, and Betsy McBride, President, of HRCCE welcomed the approximately two hundred in attendance.

An Audio Address was shared from Bob O’Neill, Executive Director of the International City/County Management Association (ICMA), the membership organization dedicated to creating excellence in local government through professional management. (Bob is a former City Manager of Hampton.)

Bob said: We find ourselves in “a time of turbulent change,” a time where we need to address how democracy works. Many issues matter, yet none can be addressed without proper public engagement. The need is great to reach across our political, municipal and geographical boundaries to make the most impact. The work we do now matters to the entire region’s future. It’s all about the possibilities.

The rest of the event was moderated by Suzette Denslow: Chief of Staff for Richmond Mayor Dwight C. Jones and formerly with the Virginia Municipal League.

Suzette shared: Civic engagement is the first step up from volunteerism. When we work together with respect, we move forward on our commonalities.

Keynote by Chris Gates: Executive Director of PACE, Philanthropy for Active Civic Engagement, a new organization founded to bring more attention and focus to the issues of civic engagement and to encourage more members of the philanthropic community to make civic engagement a part of their funding priorities. Previously served for 11 years as President of the National Civic League. A synopsis of Chris' remarks follow:

Why civic engagement? Hampton Roads as a region is an interdependence of communities. People know the moniker “Hampton Roads” around the country and are less apt to be able to name the individual cities and counties that make up the region.

To solve a problem, you must first recognize the problem, which leads us to list the greatest challenges for successful civic engagement:
  1. The Information and Technology Revolution: While we have more in-formation at our fingertips, that information is problematic. “More people are in possession of partial truths.” People are more self-empowered than ever before. “Deference to data and experts” is the old model of engagement and does not play in today’s world. Today’s model is citizens questioning everything.

  2. The Media: The practice of journalism today does not match the way com-munities live their lives. Media today is conflict based. And that conflict is en-grained in us personally by media hence our deep-seated disbelief of anything publicly stated.

  3. Diversity: No community in America is NOT struggling with diversity on some level. We exhibit nostalgia for the “way things used to be.” Why? It was “easy,” because there was only one group sitting at the table with a shared history, perspective and outlook. Today our communities are more diverse than ever, in geography, perspective, issue, culture, etc. It’s hard work to work together.

  4. Apathy: When asking why there is a lack of authentic civic engagement, we blame it on apathy, which is blaming citizens. It is nearly impossible to find truly apathetic citizens that don’t care at all about anything. Citizens are dis-engaged not because they don’t care, but because they feel their opinion doesn’t matter, their voice isn’t heard and their vote doesn’t count.
The New Reality - The New Model of Civic Engagement:
  1. The public agenda is jointly held. We have a big debate going on regarding the role of government. We don’t want a government that is big enough, powerful enough and wealthy enough to unilaterally solve all of society’s problems. And, it’s unfair to say elected officials should fix everything. The best example of civic success is government working together with nonprofits, churches and civic groups.

  2. Traditional civic engagement models make things worse. Public comment periods, public hearings, advisory boards and commissions don’t work. “Professional citizens” will usually be the only citizens that speak, and the “authentic voice” of citizens is missed. Holding public events such as these during times of day when most citizens cannot attend creates contention and anger.

  3. Collaboration is a necessity, not a nicety. On every issue, all voices must be heard, even the short-term contentious issues. Without collaboration, it’s impossible to move forward.
We must reinvent the practice of democracy. We as Americans shouldn’t break our arm to pat ourselves on the back. We shouldn’t deify the founding fathers who were white male landowners. Democracy at the beginning of America wasn’t inclusive, hence the reason for the women's suffrage and civil rights movements.

The U.S. is remarkable because we are periodically willing to say that the old rules no longer make sense, and we need to make a change. We are at one of those moments again.

The old model of democracy: people seeking power to impose their will on others.

The new model of democracy: convene and empower others with facilitation, mediation and negotiation.

The new model requires listening to everyone equally, deeply and with authentic respect. The old model is that of government as “father figure,” making things better and doing things for you.

Our “civic muscles” have atrophied in America from misuse or lack of use. Some-where along the way, we’ve forgotten that to live a complete life, we must be engaged as citizens. We ARE the government; we have a role to play; we are responsible for our own outcomes.

Q & A from attendees (in bold) with responses from Chris Gates (in italics):

Will there be a time when we need to rewrite the Constitution due to globalization and our evolving as a society?
Many states have “mucked up” their constitutions by rewriting them. They’re overloaded with specifics, and some states are debating now as to cleaning them up. Rewriting the Constitution would open a “Pandora’s Box.”

What about the respect issue? What’s the solution?
Societal norms almost don’t exist anymore. We can blame much of this on TV, with the cursing, violence and contentiousness. Society has become “coarse.” We no longer respond with politeness. The “Golden Rule” has been lost. We need civility back in civic life. We live in an era where elected officials fear for their safety.

How does civic engagement fit with regionalism?
Regionalism is of great importance. But, we have issues where we don’t have structures and vice versa. There’s a mismatch. In economic development terms, regions compete internationally.

Some regions have consolidated local governments, such as Indianapolis and Charlotte. Regionalism is based on functionality and relationship. We want to keep our own individual identities in a region, but successes can be found in shared services, shared purchasing and joint planning. Regional structures that work don’t take away local autonomy; they’re structures for listening and posi-tive conservations. They’re formed for people to WANT to work together around shared values and solutions, not forced.



What can young people do to get involved?
The single greatest predictor of whether someone will vote is age, not income or any other demographic. Youth consider politics to be inauthentic. They don’t believe they’re hearing the truth; they’re suspicious of “spin.” For youth to be involved, community service engagement is the answer. Giving something back is living a complete life. Service is the key.

What about using referendums to give citizens a direct voice in governmental decision-making?
Referendums were never intended to be used to make decisions on a daily basis, only for last minute “pressure cooker,” controversial kinds of issues. Many municipalities use them because it’s easier to just put things on ballots. However, small “d” democracy includes conversation. Most issues aren’t simply a “thumbs up” or a “thumbs down” as they were in the gladiator days of the Roman Coliseum.


Batten Survey Results by Dr. Quentin Kidd, PhD:
Associate Professor of Political Science in the Government Department at Christopher Newport University and Director of CNU’s Center for Public Policy.

Dr. Kidd introduced a video survey created by Virginian Wesleyan College senior and CRC Intern Rebecca Miller’s to gauge the youth perspective of civic engagement. One poignant segment of the video gave us a youth saying, “Right now, I am the future. And at some point in time, I will become the present. And then to the generations that are to come after me, I will be their past. And it’s how I pave the road now that determines what their future is going to be.”

Dr. Kidd reminded us that “democracy matters,” and, collectively, citizens and public officials have responsibilities in a democracy. We must work together to define our future, our quality of life as an indicator of healthy “civic capital.” Regions with healthy civic capital are also regions that are economically healthy. HRCCE’s Batten Survey establishes a baseline of the Civic Health of Hampton Roads, our values, our skills and our civic infrastructure.

The survey, made possible by a grant from citizen Jane Batten, was conducted via:
  1. Telephoning 1997 residents of the 16 cities and counties that make up Hampton Roads; these residents were a proportionally representative sample;
  2. Conducting focused interviews of approximately four dozen regional civic leaders and elected officials; and
  3. Conducting focused interviews of approximately one dozen engaged youth.
The big questions to answer with regard to civic engagement were:
  1. Are you interested, willing and ready to engage?
  2. Is information accessible, communicated and sought out?
  3. Do all parties know what to do and when?
HRCCE’s Batten Survey results reveal that in Hampton Roads we have:
  • Disconnectedness…citizens say they are somewhat or very interested in working with others to solve regional issues, yet they don’t feel invited; however, civic leaders say they want citizens to educate themselves, participate more in civic matters when invited and let their views be known;

  • Paradoxes…we seem to agree on the major issues of the economy and transportation and want to solve our regional problems, but as a result of this study, we lack a means by which to come together as a region to work on these problems, together. Furthermore, while citizens follow news about local government and public affairs somewhat or very closely, a majority of respondents say there is no reliable source or don’t know if there is reliable source of information;

  • Opportunities…the civic capital of Hampton Roads is plentiful…our job is cultivate it and capitalize on it as a region.
This is the beginning of a regional conversation about where we are, where we want to be, and what will be required to get there.

One youth interviewed did not see civic engagement as a “daunting task,” but stated that transportation was the problem that could “unify” Hampton Roads as an opportunity to come together on a common problem that bedevils the entire region.

Q & A from attendees (in bold) with responses from Dr. Quentin Kidd (in italics):

How does Hampton Roads compare to other regions?
While some information may be available, we don’t want to compare ourselves to other regions of Virginia just yet. The Batten Survey questionnaire was tailored to the Hampton Roads region, and, to our knowledge, no other region in Virginia has done this evaluation of their civic capital.

What percentage of people who have tried to become engaged just gave up?
That specific question was not asked on the survey.

Statement from audience member: We had an opportunity to come together as a region with the one-cent sales tax and we couldn’t agree; I hope we have another opportunity in the future to come together on this issue.

Why is the corporate role not included in the survey? Organizations like Future of Hampton Roads and Hampton Roads Partnership have an agenda. The citizen’s and business’ agenda are different.
In the end, corporations are all individuals. If there is a disagreement between citizens and corporation’s representatives, and we don’t work together, we’ll never come up with any solutions. Solutions will be found at the individual level.


Break-out Sessions were used to facilitate small group discussions.
Printed copies of the Batten Survey were provided to participants in Breakout Sessions.

Reconvening after Breakout Sessions: small group recommendations and demographics review, by David Campt of Dialogue With Communities:

In comparison to the Hampton Roads population, the following demographic groups were under-represented: Females, African-Americans, Hispanics, under $75,000 Household Income and Residents of less than 15 years.

Small Group Question #1:
What actions are needed to improve communication?

The results are below with the (overwhelmingly) top four vote-getters in BOLD:
  • Centralized source/organization for regional information
  • Smart use of new media: on-line forums, cell phone alerts
  • Make meetings more accessible –take them into neighborhoods, televise
  • Better civic education
  • Enhance traditional media for regional news/announcements –WHRO, TV news
  • More & better meetings
  • Make data more accessible
  • Surveys for citizen input
  • Improve values
  • Adoption of a formalized decision-making process
  • Change in regional structure

Small Group Question #2:
What is the most important thing we need to work on to improve our system of public decision-making?

The one consensus result from each of the small groups is listed below with the majority vote from the reconvened group in BOLD:
  • Invest regionally –new regional funding mechanisms, new structures. Needs further discussion (49%)
  • Emphasize values when creating the vision. Spend more time reflecting on values. Strongly Endorse/Agree (75%)
  • Emphasize more and better civic education. Strongly Endorse (74%)
  • Proactive outreach by elected officials. Strongly Endorse/Agree (88%)
  • Better recognition of pros and cons. Make sure information is fair and balanced. Strongly Endorse (64%)
  • Create a new separate entity (non-governmental) for civic discourse. Needs further discussion (36%)
  • Have a better informed and educated population. Strongly Endorse (76%)
  • Need fact based decisions instead of emotional ones. Strongly Endorse (53%)

Small Group Wrap-Up:

Of these improvements, choose the 3 most important ones that will make the public process better: (top three vote-getters in BOLD)
  • Emphasize more and better civic education. (23%)
  • Have a better informed and educated population. (17%)
  • Better recognition of pros and cons. Make sure information is fair and balanced. (16%)

Which is the easiest to accomplish? (top three vote-getters in BOLD)
  • Better recognition of pros and cons. Make sure information is fair and balanced. (26%)
  • Proactive outreach by elected officials. (24%)
  • Emphasize more and better civic education. (17%)

Which are you willing to spend time on to help accomplish? (top four vote-getters in BOLD)
  • Emphasize more and better civic education. (26%)
  • Better recognition of pros and cons. Make sure information is fair and balanced. (19%)
  • Create a new separate entity (non-governmental) for civic discourse. (16%)
  • Have a better informed and educated population. (15%)

All Batten Survey results, Summit Breakout Sessions and Final Group demographics, feedback and video may be viewed and downloaded at: http://HRCCE.org/publications/BattenSurveys/index.html.

Photo credits: Clyde R. Hoey, II, President of The Resource Group and member of the HRCCE Board of Directors.

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

A Voice for Hampton Roads

by James F. Babcock

“Who Speaks for Hampton Roads?”

This excellent question, raised by Louis Guy in a Virginian-Pilot (V-P) Dec. 27, 2008 op-ed, is especially pertinent now as the region faces a perennial crisis in transportation funding, the possible loss of an aircraft carrier, a decline in tourism, a weakened economy, and budget cuts all around.

The answer is, “No one entity ─ it depends on the issue.” Numerous private regional associations exist to speak out for particular interests: the Retail Alliance for retailers, HRACRE for commercial realtors, the Chambers of Commerce for business in general, the Cultural Alliance for the arts, and so on.

On public issues, however, where the right to answer for the general public depends on legitimacy conferred by election, the only regional organizations that can speak for the region are those in which the region’s legislators or its mayors and county chairs serve. These include the Legislative Caucus, Planning District Commission, Metropolitan Planning Organization, Mayors & Chairs Caucus, and Hampton Roads Partnership.

Each of these entities was created at a different time for a particular limited purpose. None can be said to do an especially effective job of involving the public in its decision making. And each suffers limitations that would not apply, say, to a full-blown regional government, which the public doesn’t want. As a result, as Mayor Paul Fraim observed in his year-end V-P op-ed, “No one is in charge.”

Over the past few years, the Future of Hampton Roads, a volunteer organization, through its Regional Structure Project, has sponsored conferences and study groups to produce thoughtful recommendations for improving the performance of these regional organizations without either merging our municipalities or creating a regional government. Detailed reports have been submitted in the past year to the Metropolitan Planning Organization, Hampton Roads Partnership, and Mayors & Chairs.

One study group report soon to be submitted to the elected leadership specifically deals with the urgent need identified by Mr. Guy to create an authoritative voice for Hampton Roads. Based on successful regional models elsewhere (Metro-Dade, Twin Cities Metro, etc.) but adapted to our region’s unique circumstances, the recommendation is to obtain a state charter for a Hampton Roads Metropolitan Council.

The proposed Metro Council would undertake key tasks not now being performed. It would:
  • oversee the regional aspects of economic and tourism development;
  • direct periodic updating of a comprehensive regional vision;
  • coordinate preparation of an annual regional legislative agenda; and
  • strengthen regional decision-making.
Supported by Planning District Commission staff, the proposed Metro Council would establish working relationships with the other regional organizations. For example, an updating of the regional vision every five to seven years might best be performed on behalf of the Council by the Hampton Roads Partnership. Also, the Council could engage the Hampton Roads Center for Civic Engagement to assist in creating essential public participation in basic decisions.

An alternative to creating the Council might be to refashion one of the present regional organizations. In any case, having a Metro Council with definite power to make decisions on a short list of key regional issues would provide a vehicle for more assertive regional leadership and to fill the present gap in high level policy formulation.

The huge challenges the region now faces warrant serious attention to implementing this structural improvement. We should accept Louis Guy’s advice. Let’s get organized.

Mr. Babcock, retired Chairman and CEO of First Virginia Bank Hampton Roads, is a founding member of the Hampton Roads Partnership, Vice Chairman of the Future of Hampton Roads, Inc. (FHR) and manager of FHR’s Regional Structure Project, whose reports are posted on http://www.fhrinc.org.

Friday, March 20, 2009

Public Invited to Civic Engagement Summit April 4

What needs fixing in Hampton Roads?

If you’ve been looking for a way to get involved, what’s your top issue? If you think you have a perspective other people need to hear, where should you go, and when?

Here’s a starting point for you: the first Hampton Roads Civic Engagement Summit on Saturday, April 4, 8:30 a.m. until 12:30 p.m., at the Old Dominion University’s Virginia Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Center (VMASC) in Suffolk.

The theme is “Our Region, Our Future,” is free of charge, and is open to the public with advance online registration.

The day will be a unique attempt to share and focus on an agenda derived by the citizens of Hampton Roads that identifies priority issues and opportunities we see for our future. The results of the inaugural Batten Survey, a sampling of more than 2,000 citizens throughout Hampton Roads, will be shared.

The survey, conducted by Christopher Newport University in conjunction with the Hampton Roads Center for Civic Engagement (HRCCE), establishes the “civic health” of our region. The results will help launch conversations at the Summit that, hopefully, will become the future public work of citizens and groups throughout the region.

The Summit will help average citizens participate in exploring the broader dimensions of their rights and responsibilities as citizens. Citizen input and action is needed to shape our region and its communities in these historic times.

The Summit also features two recognized civic engagement authorities, Suzette Denslow, Chief of Staff for the City of Richmond, and Chris Gates, past President of the National Civic League. Ms. Denslow was also Chief Policy Adviser for Governor Kaine and Secretary of Education during Governor Wilder’s Administration. She has extensive experience in working with communities throughout Virginia. Mr. Gates directs a national non-profit agency which specializes in civic engagement work.

If you’ve ever wondered: is there room at the table for me? April 4th will be a day set aside to measure the interest and willingness of citizens to come together and create productive paths, to do future constructive work, all to improve our quality of life in Hampton Roads.

“Our Region, Our Future” will be hosted by HRCCE in association with the Future of Hampton Roads, Hampton Roads Partnership, The Planning Council, and WHRO Public Television. Online registration is available at HRCCE’s website www.HRCCE.org.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

2009 Hampton Roads Civic Engagement Summit

You are invited you to attend the 2009 Hampton Roads Civic Engagement Summit on Saturday, April 4th at ODU’s VMASC Center.
MAP
DIRECTIONS

Purpose:
To better understand the broad dimensions of citizenship in the 21st Century and to encourage greater civic participation in Hampton Roads.

Program:
• Robert J. “Bob” O’Neil, former Hampton city manager and current executive director of the International City/County Management Association.

• Chris Gates, executive director of Philanthropy for Active Civic Engagement. Prior to joining PACE, Chris was president of the National Civic League and co-chair of Harvard University’s Saguaro Seminar on social capital.

• Hampton Roads Center for Civic Engagement’s Batten Civic Engagement Initiative, the first-ever formal assessment of civic engagement and citizen priorities in Hampton Roads.

• Opportunities for Summit participants to begin the process of identifying informational needs and other resources necessary for broader civic engagement throughout the Hampton Roads region.

Participants:
Open to all who want to have a role in addressing the challenges and defining the future of our region. The success of this event will be measured by the diversity of stakeholders who attend and by the level of purpose and passion in the conversations and new working relationships developed.

Partners:
Organized by the Hampton Roads Center for Civic Engagement (HRCCE) in cooperation with The Future of Hampton Roads, Hampton Roads Partnership, The Planning Council and WHRO.

More information can be found at: http://www.HRCCE.org.

Registration at: http://www.hrcce.org/resources/SummitRegistration.html.